果酱视频

Richey, 57, of Appleton City, pleaded guilty in 2015 to violating an order of protection. St. Clair County Associate Circuit Court Judge Jerry Rellihan sentenced Richey to 90 days in jail.

He did his time.

Then he got the bill: $3,150 for his stay behind bars.

Richey, whose story was featured last month in , was represented by a public defender. He was indigent. Broke. Poor.

Such is the case for all of Matthew Mueller鈥檚 clients. Mueller is the senior bond litigation counsel for the Missouri State Public Defender鈥檚 Office. Over the past couple of years, he has been filing appeals in cases like Richey鈥檚. After Richey couldn鈥檛 afford to pay his jail bill, Rellihan scheduled a series of payment review hearings, forcing Richey to come back to court and make a payment or explain why he couldn鈥檛. When he missed a hearing he got tossed in jail again, and got a new bill for more than $2,200. The judge, like so many others in Missouri, was treating the jail bill like a fine or a court cost.

Mueller argues it is neither of those things.

The American Civil Liberties Union has filed amicus briefs in Mueller鈥檚 appeals cases, arguing that the practice creates unconstitutional debtors prisons, putting hundreds, if not thousands of Missourians behind bars simply because they can鈥檛 afford to pay.

Soon, the Missouri Supreme Court will decide if Mueller and the ACLU are right.

In December, the court decided to fast track Richey鈥檚 case, bypassing the Court of Appeals, which had ruled in a similar case involving a Lafayette County man that the practice of charging board bills and then using the criminal courts to try to collect them is unlawful.

This week, Mueller and the ACLU gained a powerful ally.

On Monday, in his first major legal act as Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt in Richey鈥檚 case, arguing that the practice that is common in most rural counties in the state 鈥渋s unauthorized by law and must end.鈥�

In the amicus brief, Schmitt references I鈥檝e written in the past year on this debtors prison scheme. He writes that 鈥渟uch cases reflect excessively harsh attempts to extract jail debt from inmates of limited means, and that taxing jail debt as court costs in such cases is ultimately self-defeating as a policy matter.鈥�

For Schmitt, a Republican, this is not new ground.

In 2015 as a state senator from Glendale, Schmitt sponsored Senate Bill 5, which reined in similar abusive practices in municipal courts, primarily in 果酱视频 County. That law, a response to the unrest in Ferguson following the 2014 killing of Michael Brown, limited the amount of yearly revenue cities can capture from traffic infractions to 20 percent of a municipal budget, and it stopped the practice of threatening jail time to those who fell behind on their bills.

For decades, it had not been uncommon for poor, black residents of 果酱视频 County to spend days or weeks in jail simply because they couldn鈥檛 afford to pay for tickets. Their inability to pay led to more warrants and more jail time.

At the time, Schmitt referred to the practice as and he accused cities of using poor people as 鈥淎TMs鈥� shaking them down for cash.

Now, as he joins with the public defender鈥檚 office to try to stop a similar practice from taking place in rural associate circuit courts all over the state 鈥� affecting mostly poor, white people 鈥� he鈥檚 using similar language.

鈥淐ourts should not be using the threat of jail time to generate funds for bloated big government budgets when other means of collection exist,鈥� Schmitt said in a news release after filing his amicus brief. 鈥淒e facto debtors prisons have no place in Missouri, and I am proud to stand up against a system that seeks to treat its poorer citizens as ATMs.鈥�

With at least three state lawmakers 鈥� state Reps. Justin Hill, R-Lake Saint Louis, Bruce DeGroot, R-Chesterfield, and Mark Ellebracht, D-Liberty 鈥� sponsoring or co-sponsoring legislation on the debtors prison issue, that means that elements of all three branches of Missouri鈥檚 government are now on the front lines of a civil rights battle that could have repercussions for a generation of folks stuck in poverty.

They are people like Richey, or John Wright of Higginsville, or Brooke Bergen of Salem, or Victoria Branson of Farmington. They are people who have paid their debt to society, but can鈥檛 escape the long arm of the law simply because they can鈥檛 afford to pay government officials enough money to leave them alone.

鈥淣o statute authorizes this practice,鈥� Schmitt wrote in his amicus brief, 鈥渁nd it lends itself to abuses that threaten the constitutional rights of Missouri citizens 鈥� It does little good, and potentially much harm, to threaten indigent persons with more jail time and debt when they are unable to pay.鈥�